Know what the licence label leaves unanswered

Updated October 2026
Licensed
usAvailable in US
Fast payouts
18+ Only
Casino chips and licensing documents on a mahogany desk under cinematic lighting

A Curaçao licence points to a jurisdiction, not the operator’s full standards or permission to serve Great Britain.

What “Curacao casino” means when you’re playing online

A Curacao casino is an online gambling site associated with a licence from Curaçao rather than oversight by the UK Gambling Commission. In everyday use, the phrase usually points to a non-UK-regulated casino: a site operating outside the UKGC’s regulatory system. The label tells you something about the jurisdiction behind its licensing claim. It does not, by itself, tell you everything about the company running the site or what playing there will be like.

That distinction matters because “Curacao” can sound like a complete description of a casino. It isn’t. It is a shorthand players use for a category of online gambling sites, not a guarantee that every site with the label has the same owner, terms or standards. I used to see a licence badge and treat it as a shortcut for understanding the whole operation. That was too simple. A badge is a starting point for understanding what sort of site you are looking at, not a full account of it.

When considering a casino associated with a Curaçao licence from the UK, check the available details carefully and decide what matters for your circumstances. This list provides a brief reference point on the payout speed information available for each operator.

  1. Chanze

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    Chanze lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, giving you a stated timeframe to consider.

  2. Revery Play

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    Revery Play lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, which gives you a concrete detail to weigh.

  3. BeOnBet

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    BeOnBet lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. You can use this stated timeframe as one point of reference.

  4. Dieselwin

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    Dieselwin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, offering you a stated timeframe for payouts.

  5. NightWin

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    NightWin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. This gives you a specific payout detail to consider.

  6. NightLuck

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    NightLuck lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, a stated detail you can factor into your review.

  7. EvoSpin

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    EvoSpin lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, giving you a clear timeframe to consider.

  8. Zombillion

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    Zombillion lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days. You have this timeframe as a reference when assessing the operator.

  9. SpinFormula

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    SpinFormula lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, which you can take into account.

  10. Britsino

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    Britsino lists a payout speed of 1–3 business days, providing you with a stated payout timeframe.

The wider category is not unique to Curaçao. Non-UK-regulated casinos are commonly licensed in jurisdictions including Malta, Gibraltar and Anjouan as well. So when someone talks about an international or non-UK-regulated casino, they may be referring to a site connected with any of several licensing jurisdictions. “Curacao casino” is one familiar label within that broader group.

The phrase can also be used loosely. A casino may advertise a Curaçao connection, but the words alone do not explain whether the business is based there, which company operates the site, or how the licence applies to that particular service. Those are separate details. It is worth keeping them separate in your head instead of letting one place name stand in for the whole picture.

A useful plain-English definition is this: a Curacao online casino is an online gambling site presented as licensed in Curaçao and operating without UK Gambling Commission oversight. That last part is what makes the term relevant to a UK reader. The casino is not being described as a UKGC-regulated site simply because it accepts online play or displays a foreign licensing reference.

You will see the phrase written in different ways: a casino licensed in Curaçao, a Curaçao-licensed casino, or an online casino with a Curaçao licence. They all point towards the same basic idea, though the exact claim can vary from site to site. “Curacao online casinos” is often used as a bucket label, but the sites inside that bucket should not be assumed to be interchangeable.

I find it helps to separate three things: the casino website you can see, the company operating it, and the jurisdiction named in its licence information. They may be related, but the country name on a page does not explain the full arrangement. If you are comparing sites, treat “Curacao” as a clue about the regulatory setting, not as a verdict on the operator.

The word “licensed” can sound reassuring because it suggests a formal framework. But in this context, it first answers a narrower question: which jurisdiction is associated with the site’s licensing? It does not mean the UK Gambling Commission oversees the casino. Nor does the word on its own tell you whether two operators have the same policies or the same approach to customer service. Those differences sit at the level of the individual site.

There is another reason not to read too much into the label. Casino marketing often packs a lot into a short phrase: games, bonuses, payments and a suggestion of trust can all appear alongside a licence claim. When I was less careful, I let that mix blur together. Now I try to read the category plainly. A Curacao casino is a non-UK-regulated online gambling site associated with Curaçao; the rest needs to be considered on its own terms.

That is also why broad descriptions such as “the best Curacao online casinos” can be misleading if they make the licence sound like a ranking or a shared quality mark. Curaçao is a jurisdiction, not a recommendation. A label can help you identify the kind of casino being discussed, but it cannot do the comparison for you.

For now, the important point is simply the terminology. A Curacao casino belongs to the wider group of online gambling sites operating without UKGC oversight, alongside sites commonly licensed in places such as Malta, Gibraltar or Anjouan. The country named in the phrase is a regulatory clue, not a substitute for understanding which operator you are dealing with. That’s the distinction to keep.

Curacao casinos and UK law: where the responsibility sits

The legal picture is easier to follow if you separate the operator’s position from yours as a player. The Gambling Act 2005 is aimed at businesses providing gambling services to the UK market. It does not make an individual player the target simply for using a gambling site based abroad.

That distinction matters when you come across a Curacao casino or another site licensed overseas. British law does not specifically bar citizens from using gambling services authorised in another country. Nor does a player commit a criminal offence under UK law simply by gambling on a site that lacks a UK licence.

That is the narrow answer on player liability. It is not the same as saying every site is authorised to offer gambling to people in Britain, and it is not a recommendation to use one. I’ve found those ideas easy to muddle: “not a crime for the player” can sound like “approved for the market”. It doesn’t mean that.

The law’s focus is the supplier

The Act’s focus is on operators supplying gambling services into the UK market, rather than on customers placing bets. So when someone asks whether British players can be prosecuted just for using a Curacao-licensed site, the key distinction is that the legislation addresses the operator’s provision of services, not the player’s act of gambling.

A Curacao licence is a licence issued in another jurisdiction. Its existence does not, by itself, change who the Gambling Act is aimed at or turn the player into the regulated party. Likewise, calling a site “unlicensed” in a UK context does not mean that a customer has committed a criminal offence by visiting it or gambling there.

I used to read legal wording as if it gave a simple green light. It doesn’t. The player’s criminal liability and the operator’s authority to serve a market are separate questions. Keep them separate, and the wording makes more sense.

What this does not settle

It does not establish that an overseas operator has permission to serve customers in Great Britain, or that a foreign licence has the same standing as a UK one. Those are questions about the operator and its authorisation, not whether a British customer has committed an offence by using its service.

It also does not mean that every practical or contractual issue disappears. A player may still be dealing with a business based overseas and terms written for that operator’s jurisdiction. The legal point here is narrower: UK law does not expressly forbid British citizens from using gambling services licensed abroad, and gambling on a site without a UK licence is not, on its own, a criminal offence for the player.

So the short version is about responsibility, not reassurance. The law places its focus on operators supplying gambling services to the UK market; it does not criminalise the player merely for placing a bet on an unlicensed site. That distinction is useful, but it should not be stretched into a claim that a Curacao casino is authorised to serve Great Britain.

A licence label is not the same as permission to serve Great Britain

A casino’s website can display a Curaçao licence and still not be authorised to serve customers in Great Britain. Those are separate claims. The foreign licence identifies a regulatory framework the operator says it works under; it is not a substitute for a licence from the UK Gambling Commission.

That distinction is easy to miss when a site puts a badge beside its logo or describes itself as “licensed”. The word sounds reassuring, but on its own it does not tell you whether the operator holds the authorisation required to serve people in Great Britain. The relevant question is not only where the casino says it is licensed. It is whether it has the required UKGC licence for this market.

The rule applies regardless of where the operator is based. A company does not avoid it by running its website from abroad, using a foreign domain or displaying a Curaçao licence. If it serves customers in Great Britain, it requires a UK Gambling Commission licence. A foreign licence does not turn into UK authorisation just because a player can open the site.

I would keep that in mind when looking through Curacao licensed casinos, reading casino reviews or comparing a Curacao casino list. A list might tell you which licence an entry claims to hold; it cannot, by that fact alone, establish that the operator is authorised for Great Britain. Nor does calling a site a Curacao licensed casino answer the separate UK question. Two different boxes. Don’t merge them.

This matters whether you arrived at a casino through a review, saw a “Curacao casino” label on its homepage, or were looking for a particular game such as a Curacao slot. The game catalogue and the licence label do not change the authorisation requirement. Neither does a payment option: seeing a site described as a Curacao casino with Paysafecard, for instance, says nothing by itself about whether it is licensed to serve Great Britain.

So, is a Curacao casino safe? The licence label alone cannot settle that, and it should not be treated as proof of UK regulation. First separate the claims: a site may present itself as licensed elsewhere, while still lacking the UKGC authorisation required to serve customers here. That is the point worth holding on to before you take a badge, a review, or a search result at face value.

I’ve made the mistake of letting a polished homepage do too much of the thinking for me. A badge is easy to notice; the exact scope of the claim is less obvious. Read “licensed” as an incomplete statement until you know which regulator it refers to and whether the operator holds the required UK licence. That is not a recommendation to rely on a foreign licence instead. It is simply the difference between having a licence somewhere and being authorised for this market.

If a site’s wording blurs those two ideas, don’t fill in the gap yourself. A Curaçao label is not a UKGC licence. The location of the operator does not alter that requirement. Clear enough.

Curacao casinos and GamStop: what the gap means for you

A Curacao casino outside the UK Gambling Commission’s system is not part of GamStop. That distinction matters most if you have registered for self-exclusion and are relying on it to keep gambling sites out of reach. GamStop applies to participating UKGC-regulated operators; it does not automatically cover a non-UK regulated casino because that casino accepts customers from Britain or displays a foreign licence.

So, if you search for Curacao casinos not on GamStop, the practical point is not that they have a special exemption. They sit outside the scheme. A new site with a Curacao licence is no more included in GamStop simply because it has just launched. Nor does a claim that a casino is “regulated by GamStop” make sense: GamStop is a self-exclusion service, not a gambling regulator.

I used to read a licence badge as if it meant the same safeguards followed me everywhere. They don’t. The key question here is whether the operator is within the UKGC system and GamStop, not just which jurisdiction appears in its footer.

What self-exclusion does—and where it stops

GamStop gives a person a way to exclude themselves from gambling with participating UK operators. When you use a casino outside that system, the exclusion does not carry over to that site. A Curacao online casino without GamStop may therefore remain accessible even while your GamStop exclusion is active.

That gap can catch you off guard. You might have taken a deliberate step to stop yourself opening gambling accounts, then find that a site outside the scheme does not recognise that step. Don’t treat the absence of a block as a sign that gambling is safe for you, or that your self-exclusion has ended. It means the site is outside the scheme.

The same practical loss applies to responsible-gambling protections required within the UK system. At a non-UK regulated casino, you forfeit access to mandatory UK responsible-gambling tools. Those safeguards can include controls such as deposit limits and self-exclusion; you should not assume they will be available, work in the same way, or connect to GamStop just because the operator advertises responsible play.

That is the part I would focus on before making an account. A banner saying “play responsibly” is not the same thing as a tool you can use to restrict your gambling across participating sites. A promise on one casino’s page also cannot make that casino part of GamStop.

If you have already self-excluded

If you signed up to GamStop because gambling had become difficult to control, using a Curacao casino to get around that barrier defeats the purpose of the exclusion. I know how easy it is to tell yourself that one site does not count. It still involves gambling, and the UK scheme will not provide the same block there.

Pause before depositing, and don’t rely on a casino’s own account controls as a substitute for GamStop. If you need help sticking to an exclusion, contact a gambling-support service such as GamCare or GambleAware rather than looking for a site that sits outside the scheme. You do not need to wait for a crisis to ask for support.

This is also why phrases such as “Curacao casinos exempt from GamStop” can be misleading. The important point is not a special status granted to a casino. It is that casinos not on GamStop are outside the UKGC self-exclusion scheme, so its protections do not follow you there. A Curacao casino welcome bonus or no-deposit offer does not change that. The offer may be tempting, but it does not restore a safeguard you lose by playing outside the scheme.

Do

  • Use professional gambling-support services like GamCare or GambleAware
  • Treat self-exclusion as a boundary worth protecting
  • Check an operator's actual provided tools for gambling restriction

Don't

  • Rely on a casino's own account controls as a substitute for GamStop
  • Use a Curacao casino to bypass a GamStop self-exclusion
  • Assume a welcome bonus restores a lost safeguard

If you are comparing sites, don’t let payment options, a bonus headline or a licence logo distract from this basic limitation. A casino’s own tools, where offered, are separate from GamStop. You would need to understand what the operator actually provides and whether you can use it, rather than assuming it offers the same protection. And if your aim is to remain excluded, the safest decision is not to test whether an outside site will let you in.

No scheme can control every gambling website. That gap is real. If you have chosen self-exclusion, treat it as a boundary worth protecting, not a technical obstacle to work around.

Playing from the UK: crypto, cards and other payment routes

The cashier can look reassuringly familiar: card logos, e-wallets, a bank-transfer option, perhaps a crypto wallet address. But the logos are not a promise that every route will work for you. Non-UK based online casinos may accept credit cards, e-wallets, bank transfers and cryptocurrencies, sometimes using alternative payment processors. What appears in the cashier can vary by operator and may change.

I used to read a row of payment icons as a sign that depositing would be straightforward. That was too generous. A route can be listed but unavailable for your account, region or transaction; the processor handling it may also be different from the casino itself. Check the terms shown at the point of payment and make sure you understand the currency and any conversion involved before confirming. A deposit option does not, by itself, tell you how you will be able to withdraw.

Cards and bank transfers may feel familiar, but a Curacao casino accepting UK players is not thereby part of the UK system for card-funded gambling. The UK ban on gambling payments made with credit cards applies to licensed operators and payment providers; crypto can bypass the credit-card-funded route because the gambling payment is made in cryptocurrency rather than directly by card. That is a difference in the payment path, not proof that the site is authorised to serve Great Britain.

There is a catch if you buy crypto with a credit card before sending it to a casino. The casino’s deposit may be a crypto transfer, but your earlier card transaction is separate and could have its own costs or restrictions. Don’t treat crypto as a magic way to make every payment consequence disappear. I would also check that you understand how the casino credits the transfer and what happens if the amount received differs from the amount sent.

E-wallets sit somewhere between cards and crypto: you fund an account or move money through a payment service, then use that service at the casino if it is supported. Bank transfers can involve their own processing route too. Alternative processors may be part of the arrangement, so the name shown during checkout might not match the casino’s brand. Pause if the recipient or instructions are unclear.

That is the practical way to think about Curacao crypto casinos and other payment routes: they are possible channels, not a guarantee of access or a recommendation. Choose a method only after checking the operator’s current terms and the payment provider’s own conditions. Familiar branding can still hide an unfamiliar route. Short version: read before sending.

Slots and bonuses: read the small print before you spin

Slots can look familiar wherever you play. Book of Dead and Starburst are examples you may come across, but a recognisable game does not make the bonus attached to it straightforward. I’ve learned to treat “free” as an advertising word: the conditions decide whether any winnings can actually be withdrawn.

Bonus Terms Check
  • Verify the exact wagering requirement multiplier
  • Determine if the multiplier applies to the bonus, deposit, or both
  • Check for withdrawal caps on free spin winnings
  • Identify which games contribute toward the wagering requirements
  • Confirm the bonus expiry date

The first thing I check is the wagering requirement. It says how much qualifying play is required before bonus-related winnings become withdrawable. A specialist casino review I read reported offshore welcome offers with requirements of 35 times the bonus or more. That is a reported example, not a standard that applies to every Curacao casino bonus. The offer on the screen can differ, and its own terms are what matter.

Then check what the multiplier applies to. A specialist review described an offer with a 40-times requirement applied to the bonus and deposit together, the bonus alone, or the bonus and free spins together, depending on the promotion. Those are very different calculations. If you read only the large bonus figure, you can miss the part that determines how much qualifying play is expected.

Free spins deserve their own close read. A specialist review reported examples where winnings from free spins carried wagering requirements of 30 to 50 times the winnings, alongside withdrawal caps ranging from £5 to £50. Treat those as examples reported in a review, not terms you can assume every operator uses. Check whether the cap limits what you can cash out, and whether the winnings have to meet a separate playthrough condition.

I’d also look for which games count towards wagering and whether the offer has an expiry condition. If the rules do not make those points clear, I would not assume every spin contributes equally or that the bonus stays available indefinitely. The important details are often in the promotion terms rather than the banner.

With Curacao casino sites, the slot catalogue may be the tempting part; the bonus rules are where I slow down. Before opting in, find the exact requirement, its calculation base, eligible games, any cash-out cap and the conditions for withdrawing. If those terms are unclear, the headline offer tells you very little. That’s the catch.

What a Curacao gaming licence does—and does not—tell you

A Curacao gaming licence tells you something about the jurisdiction under which a casino says it operates. It does not, by itself, tell you that the site gives you the same safeguards as a casino regulated in the UK. I used to treat a licence badge as a neat little stamp saying “checked”. It is not that simple.

The distinction matters most when you look beyond the label. UK Gambling Commission-licensed operators are subject to UK rules on responsible gambling and data protection. A non-UK-regulated casino may work under less demanding requirements in those areas. That does not prove that every Curacao-licensed site handles player information badly or ignores safer-gambling concerns; it means the licence alone is not enough to assume the UK standard applies.

So what should you take from a Curacao gaming licence? Treat it as a clue about the casino’s regulatory setting, not a complete description of how it will treat you. The name on a badge can look reassuring, but it cannot answer every practical question about a site’s policies, its handling of personal data or the safeguards it offers. Read the casino’s own terms and privacy information, and pay attention to what they actually say rather than what the word “licensed” suggests.

That is also why Curacao casino ratings need careful reading. A high rating may reflect a reviewer’s overall view, but it does not change which regulator oversees the casino or what rules apply to it. I’d separate the rating from the licence claim: one is an assessment, the other points to a regulatory jurisdiction. Neither is a substitute for checking the site’s own information.

And is a Curacao casino legal in the UK? The short answer depends on what you mean by “legal”: a foreign licence is not the same thing as UK regulatory oversight. If you are weighing up a site, keep those ideas separate instead of letting one licence logo stand in for every kind of protection. A badge is one detail. Not the whole picture.

This is not a reason to assume the worst about every Curacao eGaming casino. It is a reason not to assume the best, either. I now read the licence claim as a starting point for understanding the operator’s framework, not as a promise of UK-level safeguards. That small distinction can stop a polished badge doing more work in your mind than it should.

A licence can tell you where to look. It cannot, on its own, settle what protections you can expect.

Licensed crypto casinos: deposits can be easier than cashing out

A Curacao licence claim and a crypto deposit option can look reassuring together: one suggests oversight, the other suggests a straightforward way to fund an account. I’ve learned not to treat either as a promise about getting money back. A licence label does not tell you how a particular operator will handle a withdrawal, and a deposit that goes through does not prove the cash-out process will be equally simple.

Non-UK-regulated casinos may set more lenient deposit and withdrawal policies. That can mean fewer restrictions and, in some cases, faster payouts. But “may” matters. The policy is the operator’s, and the practical result depends on its terms and how it applies them. A Curacao-licensed crypto casino is not automatically a quick-payout casino.

Before depositing, look for the withdrawal terms rather than relying on the payment options shown beside the cashier. Check whether the site explains how winnings can be withdrawn, what conditions apply, and whether the same route is available for both deposits and withdrawals. Payment methods can be treated differently in each direction. If the terms are vague, hard to find or inconsistent, that uncertainty is part of the decision.

I used to focus on the easy bit: money going in. That tells you very little about what happens when you ask for it back. “Fast crypto payouts” is a sales phrase, not a guarantee. Read the conditions before you fund the account, and keep a copy of what they say at the time. Terms may change, so don’t assume the wording you saw when registering will settle every later dispute.

A more flexible policy can be useful, but flexibility is not the same as protection. If a payment is delayed or handled differently from what you expected, a foreign licence does not itself make the operator’s process predictable. Nor does a crypto option remove the need to understand the rules attached to withdrawals.

The plain distinction is this: depositing shows that the site accepted your funds. It does not show that withdrawing will be equally easy. Check the cash-out terms first. Then decide whether you are comfortable with the uncertainty.

Withdrawal Risks

A Curacao licence and crypto options do not guarantee easy cash-outs. You should check the specific withdrawal terms, verify if the same route is available for both deposits and withdrawals, and be aware that "fast payouts" are often sales phrases rather than guarantees.

Skrill, Neteller and Trustly: payment options don’t set payout times

When I see Skrill, Neteller or Trustly mentioned, I try not to read it as a promise about how quickly I’ll get money back. An e-wallet or bank-transfer option describes a route for moving funds; it doesn’t tell you how long the casino will take to approve a withdrawal, or whether that route will be available when you cash out.

Published estimates for non-GamStop casinos are not consistent. One commonly cited range is 24 hours to five business days, with the payment method affecting the timing. But other accounts say a withdrawal at a non-UK-regulated casino can take three or four weeks. That gap matters. There is no UK regulatory clock to make an offshore operator meet a particular payout deadline, so a quick estimate is not a guarantee.

I used to focus on the name of the payment service and treat it like a shortcut. It isn’t. The operator may have its own checks and processing queue, and a deposit method may not be offered for withdrawals. Read the cashier and withdrawal terms before putting money in, including any stated processing stages and conditions. Keep a copy of what the site says; terms can be harder to pin down once a payout is pending.

There is also a separate question: how much can you withdraw at once? A specialist review has reported daily, weekly or monthly withdrawal caps at some non-UK-regulated casinos, which can mean receiving a large win in instalments. That is a report about particular offers and operators, not a rule that applies everywhere. Check the terms for the specific site rather than assuming the payment logo tells you.

If you are comparing Skrill, Neteller and Trustly, compare the withdrawal rules attached to each option, not just whether it appears on the deposit page. Look for minimum and maximum withdrawal amounts, fees, verification conditions and whether the same method can be used both ways. If those details are unclear, that uncertainty is part of the risk.

A familiar payment name can make a casino feel more dependable than it is. It only tells you how a transaction might be routed. It does not settle when the operator will release your money.

Are Curacao casinos safe or legit? The risks that matter after a win

A site can look polished, accept your deposit and still become difficult to deal with when you ask for your money back. That is the point where I stop judging it by the lobby and look at how it handles a problem.

A specialist review has reported cases where offshore operators asked for notarised documents or a video call before processing a withdrawal. That is not something I’d assume every site will demand, but it shows how verification can become a hurdle after you have already won. Keep copies of the terms and any messages, and do not send sensitive documents through a channel you cannot verify as belonging to the operator.

“Legit” can mean the site exists and takes bets; it does not tell you whether a payout dispute will be resolved fairly. If an operator freezes an account or changes its position on a withdrawal, you cannot take the case to the UK Gambling Commission or use the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service. There is no UK regulator to step in on your behalf.

That loss of recourse matters more than the colour of a licence badge. You also give up mandatory UK responsible-gambling tools when you use an offshore casino. If gambling is becoming hard to control, that is a serious cost, not a minor feature difference.

So, are Curacao casinos safe? There is no blanket answer from the label alone. Treat every deposit as money you might struggle to recover, and read the withdrawal and verification terms before paying in. If the rules are vague, the operator is hard to identify, or support will not answer a straightforward question, I would take that as a reason to walk away. I have learned not to confuse a smooth sign-up with a reliable cashout.

Before using any gambling service, check the laws that apply where you live and understand the risks of using an offshore site. A win is only useful if you can actually access it.

What payment options are available at non-UK casinos?

You may be able to deposit using credit cards, e-wallets, bank transfers or cryptocurrencies, often through alternative processors. Some casinos also accept payments charged to your mobile phone bill or deducted from a prepaid balance.

What is the biggest risk of playing at a non-UK-regulated casino?

You have fewer protections if something goes wrong: there may be no independent dispute-resolution route, and your funds may not be segregated from the operator’s. If the operator fails, you could be an unsecured creditor.

UK law does not explicitly prohibit you from using a gambling service licensed abroad, and players do not commit a criminal offence simply by gambling on an unlicensed site. However, operators serving customers in Great Britain need a UK Gambling Commission licence.

Are Anjouan casinos connected to the GamStop self-exclusion scheme?

No. Anjouan-licensed casinos are not required to integrate with GAMSTOP.

Responsible Gambling

Content created by the «rendersbyshailesh» team